Andy Cohen Delivers Blistering Rebuke to Anti-Gay Marriage Campaigner Kim Davis

Kim Davis first rose to national prominence in 2015, when, as county clerk of Rowan County, Kentucky, she refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples despite that year’s Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which established marriage equality as a constitutional right in the United States . Davis cited her Christian beliefs in denying licenses and was subsequently jailed for five days for contempt of court, becoming a symbol for opponents of same-sex marriage .

In July 2025, Davis renewed her campaign against marriage equality by petitioning the US Supreme Court to revisit and potentially overturn Obergefell v. Hodges. Her legal team, led by Mat Staver, argued that the landmark ruling was “flawed” and claimed it has “produced disastrous results,” particularly for what they described as “religious liberty” . This move came as over 800,000 LGBTQ+ couples have married in the US since the ruling, underscoring the significance of Davis’s efforts for millions of Americans .

Responding to Davis’s latest Supreme Court petition, Andy Cohen addressed the controversy during a segment of his Bravo talk show, *Watch What Happens Live*. Cohen, known for his candid commentary and unapologetic support for LGBTQ+ rights, named Davis “tonight’s jack hole” in a pointed on-air segment .

Cohen’s critique drew attention to Davis’s personal history, stating: “Lady, you’ve been married four times to three different people, reportedly getting pregnant with husband number three, while still married to husband number one. And you want to lecture us on the sanctity of marriage?!” . This remark highlighted the perceived hypocrisy in Davis’s campaign and resonated deeply with viewers who have long witnessed similar double standards in debates over marriage equality .

Cohen’s takedown quickly circulated on social media, sparking a wave of support from LGBTQ+ advocates, allies, and other public figures. Many praised Cohen for using his platform to stand up against discrimination and to call out the inconsistencies in Davis’s arguments . The LGBTQ+ community has frequently pointed to Davis’s actions as emblematic of broader efforts to roll back hard-won rights, particularly in the face of ongoing legislative and judicial challenges to equality .

Advocacy organizations noted that attempts to overturn Obergefell would not only impact same-sex couples but also set a dangerous precedent for the erosion of other civil liberties. “Every time marriage equality is challenged, it sends a message to LGBTQ+ people that our lives and loves are up for debate,” said a spokesperson for the Human Rights Campaign in a statement following Davis’s Supreme Court petition .

Legal experts have warned that while the Supreme Court has not yet agreed to hear Davis’s case, the continued efforts to undermine Obergefell reflect ongoing resistance to LGBTQ+ rights at both state and national levels . Recent years have seen a rise in legislative proposals targeting LGBTQ+ families, coupled with rhetoric that seeks to frame marriage equality as an affront to religious freedom—a framing that advocates argue is misleading and harmful .

Cohen’s segment, though humorous in tone, underscored the seriousness of these attacks and the need for vigilance in defending equal rights. “The fight for marriage equality didn’t end in 2015,” Cohen remarked. “We have to keep showing up—on TV, in court, and in the streets—because our families deserve respect and protection, not just tolerance” .

Andy Cohen’s public rebuke of Kim Davis serves as both a rallying cry and a reminder of the importance of continued advocacy for LGBTQ+ rights. As Davis’s Supreme Court petition reignites debate over marriage equality, Cohen’s words echo the resolve of a community unwilling to cede ground on fundamental freedoms. The coming months will be critical in determining the future of marriage equality in the United States—but for now, the LGBTQ+ community and its allies remain united in solidarity and resistance.